
 |
|
06-28-2009, 06:03 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Dr.Mike
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In the Mitten
Posts: 19
|
high comp build.
I just picked up another CRX, but it's got a Z6 block and p29 slugs... I wanna stay non Vtec, and have an A6 head that I wanna mill.
As a rough estimate, before I rebuild and clay... how much "should" I be able to shave off of my head?
Just trying to get a maximum and an estimate on the C/R I'll expect.
Thank yalls!
Dr. Mike
|
|
|
06-28-2009, 06:07 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,435
|
No P29s....
|
|
|
06-28-2009, 06:12 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Dr.Mike
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In the Mitten
Posts: 19
|
Originally Posted by rushi
|
|
No P29s....
|
and why? enlighten me
|
|
|
06-28-2009, 07:20 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
The Red Tape Avenger
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Transitioning into the Civilian World
Posts: 2,978
|
P29s are terrible. Low compression height, high domes that split the combustion chamber into a terrible chamber, no quench to speak of, engines built with these require higher octane and/or more timing retard to survive, but are prone to detonation before peak power limits on available pump gas (knock limited), and generally are not conducive to any sort of cumbustion efficiency.
76mm PG6s from FJT. 30mm compression height, which puts the piston at .002" below the deck, 1.5cc dome, which is low enough to not interfere with any sort of flame-front travel, slight valve reliefs and plenty of meat on the tops to shape any relief you ned for extreme mills of the head and cams, dirt cheap, can run well on lower octane and less spark timing which makes for a much more efficient engine, offset wrist pin bore to apply power more quickly to the crank through the crankshaft, more oil drain holes than any other stock-type piston, and making your life easier in tuning.
That's why.
__________________
Not so obvious and ruthlessly odd . . .
My quench is tighter than yours! :P
Last edited by The_Beave; 06-29-2009 at 03:51 AM.
Reason: speel chking
|
|
|
06-28-2009, 09:03 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Odd Ball
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 382
|
Originally Posted by The_Beave
|
P29s are terrible. Low compression height, high domes that split the combustion chamber into a terrible chamber, no quench to speak of, engines built with these require higher octane and/or more timing retard to survive, but are prone to detonation before peak power limits on available pump gas (knock limited), and generally are not conducive to any sort of cumbustion efficiency.
76mm PG6s from FJT. 30mm compression height, which puts the piston at .002" below the deck, 1.5cc dome, which is low enough to not interfere with any sort of flame-front travel, slight valve reliefs and plenty of meat on the tops to shape any relief you ned for extreme mills of the head and cams, dirt cheap, can run well on lower octane and less spark timing which makes for a much more efficient engine, offset ring bore to apply power more quickly to the crank through the crankshaft, more oil drain holes than any other stock-type piston, and making your life easier in tuning.
That's why.
|
__________________
The sky is the limit, that is, if the sky is money.
|
|
|
06-29-2009, 02:07 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,435
|
Yea Beave expressed it quite perfectly.
I had PM7(same as P29 but with coated skirt) pistons in my previous D16Z6. With 12.5:1 CR and Crower 3 cam, it required minimun of 33deg of advance to make any kind of power at higher RPM. Now with my new D15B2 (Bisi 2.2 cam) I run 23 degrees and still get plug ground strap colored almost full lenght. I wonder, if you can have ten crank degrees less duration of negative work done, what kind of effect it will have on engine's output..
See here how much the PM3 head can be milled and a couple of tricks to make it work
Milling the head ALOT and problems related to it
|
|
|
06-29-2009, 05:23 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Dr.Mike
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In the Mitten
Posts: 19
|
Originally Posted by The_Beave
|
P29s are terrible. Low compression height, high domes that split the combustion chamber into a terrible chamber, no quench to speak of, engines built with these require higher octane and/or more timing retard to survive, but are prone to detonation before peak power limits on available pump gas (knock limited), and generally are not conducive to any sort of cumbustion efficiency.
76mm PG6s from FJT. 30mm compression height, which puts the piston at .002" below the deck, 1.5cc dome, which is low enough to not interfere with any sort of flame-front travel, slight valve reliefs and plenty of meat on the tops to shape any relief you ned for extreme mills of the head and cams, dirt cheap, can run well on lower octane and less spark timing which makes for a much more efficient engine, offset wrist pin bore to apply power more quickly to the crank through the crankshaft, more oil drain holes than any other stock-type piston, and making your life easier in tuning.
That's why.
|
Thank you... exactly what I was looking for.
Dr. Mike
|
|
|
06-29-2009, 08:37 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
The Red Tape Avenger
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Transitioning into the Civilian World
Posts: 2,978
|
You're welcome.
__________________
Not so obvious and ruthlessly odd . . .
My quench is tighter than yours! :P
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 07:33 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Dr.Mike
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In the Mitten
Posts: 19
|
so I decided....
Z6:
block, crank, and rods
PM3 Pistons (d15b2)
D16A6 head
yields a 10.8 ratio w/ a z6 gasket.... not bad since I'm thinking about running 5 psi on it..... YEA YEA I KNO.... but, I'm addicted to boost, and I can tune like a MOFO.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 08:15 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
The Red Tape Avenger
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Transitioning into the Civilian World
Posts: 2,978
|
You are going to put PM3s n a 1.6L block?
PM3s have a 30.7mm compression height. That will have the pistons stick up .7mm from a stock deck 1.6L engine.
Just so you know . . .
__________________
Not so obvious and ruthlessly odd . . .
My quench is tighter than yours! :P
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:51 PM.
|